Before 1972 Georgia and other states that provided for capital punishment used systems that gave juries broad discretion in deciding whether to impose the death penalty on persons convicted of death-eligible offenses. In Furman v. Georgia, the U.S. Supreme Court struck down this feature of Georgia’s capital sentencing scheme and in effect invalidated the death penalty, as then administered, throughout the United States.

The  Court, in a five-to-four decision, reasoned that capital sentencing based on the unguided discretion of juries offends the “cruel and unusual punishment” clause of the Eighth Amendment, because it permits juries to impose the distinctively profound sentence of death on some convicted defendants while other juries impose the far different sentence of life imprisonment on large numbers of similarly situated defendants convicted of exactly the same crime. There was no majority opinion written for Furman, but Justice Potter Stewart captured the thought of a critical group of justices when he wrote, “These death sentences are cruel and unusual in the same way that being struck by lightning is cruel and unusual.” The Eighth Amendment, he explained, “cannot tolerate the infliction of a sentence of death under legal systems that permit this unique penalty to be so wantonly and so freakishly imposed.”

Potter Stewart
Potter Stewart

Courtesy of Library of Congress, Prints and Photographs Division

In a dissenting opinion joined by four members of the Court, Chief Justice Warren Burger argued that, while “the Eighth Amendment forbids the imposition of punishments that are so cruel and inhumane as to violate society’s standards of civilized conduct,” the amendment “most assuredly does not speak to the power of legislatures to confer sentencing discretion on juries.” In his view a long history of acceptance, the legal system’s “basic trust in lay jurors,” and “the primacy of the legislative role” in fixing criminal punishments rendered the death penalty constitutional, even when imposed pursuant to unguided-discretion sentencing schemes.

Share Snippet Copy Copy with Citation

Updated Recently

A More Perfect Union

The New Georgia Encyclopedia is supported by funding from A More Perfect Union, a special initiative of the National Endowment for the Humanities.

Image

Potter Stewart

Potter Stewart

Potter Stewart, pictured in 1976, served as a justice on the U.S. Supreme Court from 1959 until 1981.

Courtesy of Library of Congress, Prints and Photographs Division